strongermonster:

i’m at a concert thingy and the bands don’t start for another 2 hours, but they have the stage set up and are letting people come up and do karaoke. this family just went up w their kids to belt out cartoon songs and when they held the mic up for the baby to try, it babbled cutely for a sec and then grabbed on and unleashed one of those horrible piercing baby SCREAMS at the top of their little baby lungs and i’m pretty sure wiped out the first 3 rows of people lmao

(via fluent-in-lesbianism)

rainbow–skies:

hesbythecampfire:

fxlthyangxl:

image

website

StopNCII.org isĀ operated by the Revenge Porn Helpline which is part of SWGfL, a charity that believes that everyone should benefit from technology, free from harm. Founded in 2000, SWGfL works with a number of partners and stakeholders around the world to protect everyone online

Sounds legit

[ID: A screenshot of text in a TikTok. It reads:

Cousins, if someone ever edits your photo with AI or Photoshop to create a nude photo, then you go to www.stopncii.org/ and submit the original photo and the edited photo, then they will remove the edited photo from all the places on the internet. You don’t need to talk directly to anyone for this and your identity will remain confidential. /end ID]

(via seananmcguire)

thisismisogynoir:

guulabjamuns:

bogbodybutter:

cullenvhenan:

if you’re a white creator and your brown/black characters are always sassy, reckless, aggressive or cold and your white characters are always soft, demure, shy and introverted you should think about maybe why you did that

image

sorry to hijack your post, but imo this also applies to colourism dynamics, even if you have a full cast of colour. like i can only confidently speak from the south asian context, but RAMPANT colourism in the community has given rise to and perpetuated these same stereotypes of people with darker skin being more aggressive and sexually promiscuous than theĀ ā€œreserved, civilisedā€ light skins.Ā 

This applies to your wlw and mlm ships as well. If the lighter or white one is always sweeter, nicer, softer, more innocent, or more feminine and the darker or poc one is always meaner, louder, more aggressive, more sexual, or more masculine then you’ve got a problem sweetie and that’s racism.Ā 

If you reblogged this from me then please reblog this addition too!Ā 

(via saccharinerose)

thisismisogynoir:

guulabjamuns:

bogbodybutter:

cullenvhenan:

if you’re a white creator and your brown/black characters are always sassy, reckless, aggressive or cold and your white characters are always soft, demure, shy and introverted you should think about maybe why you did that

image

sorry to hijack your post, but imo this also applies to colourism dynamics, even if you have a full cast of colour. like i can only confidently speak from the south asian context, but RAMPANT colourism in the community has given rise to and perpetuated these same stereotypes of people with darker skin being more aggressive and sexually promiscuous than theĀ ā€œreserved, civilisedā€ light skins.Ā 

This applies to your wlw and mlm ships as well. If the lighter or white one is always sweeter, nicer, softer, more innocent, or more feminine and the darker or poc one is always meaner, louder, more aggressive, more sexual, or more masculine then you’ve got a problem sweetie and that’s racism.Ā 

If you reblogged this from me then please reblog this addition too!Ā 

(via saccharinerose)

i-was-today-years-old-when:

i learned that legendary footballer Lionel Messi’s first contract was written on a restaurant napkin during a meeting with FC Barcelona executives. That napkin is now held in a safe in the Credit Andorra bank (x)

image

(via only1600kids)

andgently:

redemption arcs that double as tragedies!! you’re a better person than you’ve ever been and you have nothing left to your name!!you have to rebuild yourself and your life from the ground up and you’re smiling in the ashes!! you were devastated your life is ruined!!! nothing is ever going to be the same ever again you are never going to regain what you had you are never going to be free of the guilt you are never going to be able to go home there is nothing left for you!!! you are free you are more yourself than you’ve ever been!! fires help forests grow!!

(via motorcyclegirlfriends)

pixel-mess:

taikeero-lecoredier:

hashtagloveloses:

hashtagloveloses:

hashtagloveloses:

if you’re a new tumblr user from tiktok or IG or something and only like posts and dont reblog them yeah people will think you’re a bot and block you but you will also make this website actively worse. they want ā€œalgorithmicā€ users like you, served recommended posts through likes, not people who just follow each other and respond to the direct chronological feed. there is a reason this website is still better than the rest, even with all its problems, do not ruin this

ok i need to make this clearer: if you do not reblog posts and only like them you are contributing to this site actively getting worse and becoming like all the apps you hate. keep likes to things you just wanna keep off your blog. reblog everything else. ESPECIALLY fanart, which always needs a reblog.

and FYI: what i’m saying here is backed up by tumblr themselves. they admit this publicly.

image
image

if you want a good RECENT (as of the end of February 2022) overview of what is going on behind the scenes at tumblr, it is basically what i’ve been saying for years: the core staff is tiny, constantly not being listened to when they advocate for us, the community, and working there is a nightmare:

Reblogging to encourage people instead of only liking is really not that fucking hard if you dont want people to be discouraged cuz their stuff get zero interactions and 99% useless likes and be driven off the Platform.

Thank yall for this! I thought reblogging wasnt good because that it just puts stuff out there that is already out there, but now i am going to reblog bc I learned and stuff ig. IDK what i was going to say

ig thanks bc now im not scared to reblog out of fear of hate

(via moniquill)

lyricwritesprose:

three–rings:

mikkeneko:

doctorbluesmanreturns:

pennie-dreadful:

fluffmugger:

godlessondheimite:

image

#so did they miss the part where gatsby ends up floating dead in a pool and all the miserable deaths in wuthering heights#or did they miss that because there weren’t any chapters titled In Which The Sinners Are Punished For Their Errors#like. even if you require explicit moral instruction from literature it’s pretty hard to miss the comeuppance in those.

ā€œWhat I assume my teachers were trying to teach meā€

image

Huck Finn is about a white Southern boy who was raised to believe that freeing slaves is a sin that would send you directly to hell who forges a familial bond with a runaway slave and chooses to free him and thereby in his mind lose his salvation because he refuses to believe that his best friend and surrogate father is less of a man just because he’s black. Yes it features what we now consider racial slurs but this is a book written only 20 years after people were literally fighting to be allowed to keep other human beings as property, we cannot expect people from the 1880s to exactly conform with the social mores of 2020, and more to the point if we ourselves had been raised during that time period there’s very little doubt that we would also hold most if not all of the prevalent views of the time because actual history isn’t like period novels written now where the heroes are perfect 21st century social justice crusaders and the villains are all as racist and sexist as humanly possible. Change happens slowly and ignoring the radical statement that we’re all human beings that Twain wrote at a time when segregation and racial tensions were still hugely prevalent just because he wrote using the language of his time period is short-sighted and foolhardy to the highest degree.

I’m really kind of alarmed at the rise in the past few years of theĀ ā€œand we do condemn! wholeheartedly!ā€ discourse around historical figures. it seems like people have somehow boomeranged betweenĀ ā€œmorals were different in the past, therefore nobody in the past can ever be held accountable for ANY wrongsā€ toĀ ā€œmorals are universal and timeless, and anything done wrong by today’s standards in the past is ABSOLUTELY unforgiveableā€ so completely, because social media 2.0 is profoundly allergic to nuance

please try this on for size:

there have always been, in past times as today, a range of people in every society, some of whom were even then fighting for a more just and compassionate accord with their fellow man and some of whom let their greeds and hatreds rule them to the worst allowable excesses. the goal of classics and history education is to teach you enough context to discern between the two, not only in the past but in the present

My mind just boggles at the ā€œThere’s Racism In That Bookā€ argument.Ā  Yes, there is racism in that book, because that book is ABOUT RACISM.Ā  The message is that it is BAD.Ā 

My high school English teacher, who was a viciously brilliant woman, used to say that when people banned Huck Finn they said it was about the language, but it was really the message they were trying to ban, the subversive deconstruction of (religious) authority and white supremacy.

Huckleberry Finn can actually be seen as a powerful case study in trying to do social justice when you have absolutely no tools for it, right down to vocabulary.Ā  And in that respect, it’s a heroic tale, because Huck—with absolutely no good examples besides Jim, who he has been taught to see as subhuman, with no guidance, with everyone telling him that doing the right thing will literally damn him, with a vocabulary that’s full of hate speech—he turns around and says, ā€œI’m not going to do it.Ā  I’m not going to participate in this system.Ā  If that means I go to Hell, so be it.Ā  Going to Hell now.ā€

(I used to read a blogger who insisted that ā€œAll right, I’ll go to Hell,ā€ from Huckleberry Finn is the most pure and perfect prayer in the canon of American literature.Ā  Meaning, as I understand it, that the decision to do the right thing in the face of eternal damnation is the most holy decision one can make, and if God Himself is not proud of the poor mixed-up kid, then God Himself is not worth much more than a ā€œGet thee behind me,ā€ and the rest of us should be lining up to go to Hell too.Ā  Worth noting that this person identified as an evangelical Christian, not because he was in line with what current American evangelicals believe, but because ā€œthey can change their name, I’m not changing mine.ā€Ā  Interesting guy.Ā  Sorry for the long parenthetical.)

Anyway, the point of Huck Finn, as far as I can tell, is that you can still choose to do good in utter darkness, with no guidance and no help and none of the right words.

And when you put it like that, it’s no wonder that a lot of people on Tumblr—people who prioritize words over every other form of social justice—find it threatening and hard to comprehend.

(via ghostly-insights)

theoneandonlyespa:

tawghasa:

One thing that tickled me about the Barbie movie was how Gloria’s husband is (imo) a ‘Real World’ Ken.

We see very little of him in the movie. In both of his scenes, he’s trying to speak/learn Spanish. He does nothing important or if consequence in terms of the plot… But he’s trying to learn a language his wife and daughter speak. He’s not excelling, I’m not even sure if he’s succeeding. But he is kensistently trying.

For all of the 'Real World’ men who are antagonists or opponents to Barbie, El Esposo de Gloria (as he is listed in the credits) has true Kenergy.

Also (SPOILERS FROM HERE ON NOW DONT READ UNDER THE LINE IF YOU DONT WANT SPOILERS)

Keep reading

(via fluent-in-lesbianism)


Indy Theme by Safe As Milk